Social Media for the Medical Practice

Social Media for the Medical Practice

 
Recently, members of the New Hampshire Medical Group Management Association (NHMGMA) were treated to an engaging presentation, given by Dan Dunlop of Jennings. This presentation on Social Media for the Medical Practice showed members how it could benefit and improve their own practices. Because the audience enjoyed the material, we thought we would share it with you since you may be wondering how social media might be useful in your practice.
 
(If the video does not load, simply refresh your browser.)

 
We would love to hear your thoughts on this presentation. If you already use social media for your medical practice, let us know what you are doing and how your response has been. In addition, we would love to hear your questions. Just simply add your thoughts to the comments box below. And, of course, if you have enjoyed this post, we would love it if you would share it.  Thank you!
 
This Social Media for the Medical Practice presentation was provided by Dan Dunlop. Dan is principal of Jennings, a leading healthcare marketing and audience engagement firm. He is a healthcare marketer, brand consultant, blogger, author, and sought-after speaker, regularly serving on the faculty of national and regional healthcare conferences.
 
Dan is the author on the chapter on marketing the medical practice in Essentials of Physician Practice Management, published by Jossey-Bass 2004. Editor Blair Keagy MD. It is a textbook used in medical schools. Essentials of Physician Practice Management offers a practical reference for administrators and medical directors and provides a comprehensive text for those preparing for a career in medical administration, practice management, and health plan administration.
 
Dan Dunlop - Social Media for Medical Practices
Dan Dunlop – Jennings
104-A North Elliott Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
p: 919.929.0225
f: 919.968.8278
e: ddunlop@jenningsco.com


 

Patient Safety

Digital Devices and Patient Safety

Digital Devices and Patient Safety

 

Digital Devices and Patient Safety

Our blog on Digital Devices and Patient Safety comes from the October 22, 2013 #HCLDR tweet chat.  This tweet chat is held on Tuesday evenings at 8:30 p.m. EST.   In an open group, individual healthcare stakeholders from all over the world come together each week to discuss healthcare topics that affect us all. Who are these stakeholders?  They include patients, nurses, physicians, techies, geeks…. anyone who has an interest in improving healthcare.
Consider this as your personal invitation to join us!

We are particularly fond of this October session that focused on Digital Devices and Patient Safety. Since the subject was interesting and relevant to our promoting risk management and patient safety, we think our blog will provide some good food for thought in using digital devices and being mindful of how it affects others. This is great learning for all of us!

 

Question on Decreasing Digital Distractions in the Workplace

Here is our Digital Devices and Patient Safety question, provided by our co-pilot, Lisa Fields, aka @Practical Wisdom:

 

“T1” refers to our participants answering this question.  Before reading some of our participants’ responses, we invite you to pause and think about this question and how affects you and your work environment.

 

 

There is a lot of truth to this statement.   It’s exciting to learn and use new devices, but they are being added on top of our very busy worlds.

 

Digital Device Interface design is important and must come from the users, since they know their work processes best.

 

 

Absolutely!  See references below.

 

 

It’s natural to think that multitasking increases the number of tasks we can check off our lists.  Not so. Focusing on one task at hand and getting it done provides more accurate results and the satisfaction of checking that one To-Do item off your list.

 

 

Think about it.  If your physician were to provide little eye contact and engagement because he was too busy typing office notes into his/her computer, how would that make you feel?  How does this affect your experience as the patient? Does this spark any changes you want to make as a physician in your own practice?

 

 

Doesn’t this make sense?  We get so mentally involved in our thinking during digital tasks, that sometimes we have to “wake-up” to the issues right in front of us.

 

 

Doesn’t this say it all?  We hope you found this discussion enlightening.  We welcome your comments and suggestions on what you would like to see in future blogs.

 

Resources for our Digital Devices and Patient Safety blog:

Our #HCLDR tweet chat is hosted by:  Colin Hung (@Colin_Hung) and Lisa Fields (@PracticalWisdom). Thank You!

For this session, our Pre-Tweet Chat Blog entitled Maintaining Our Focus in a Digitally Distracting World: http://hcldr.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/oct-22nd-focus-in-a-digitally-distracting-world/

Are You Tired of Alarm Fatigue?: https://www.ecri.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=35

Distractions Lead to Mistakes by Nurses:
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Distractions+lead+to+mistakes+by+nurses.-a0230144539

Consent to Settle

Consent to Settle Clause

Consent to Settle

Consent to Settle language within a malpractice insurance policy is important for insureds to understand prior to purchasing coverage.  This is because the language within the clause details the extent to which an insured is responsible for claims payment, and how the claims will be paid. It can provide the insured with superior coverage or coverage left with unexpected holes in it.  Let us look at the following Consent to Settle Clauses from two actual policies:

 

Consent to Settle – Example 1

The COMPANY shall not settle any CLAIM without the written consent of the INSURED against whom the CLAIM has been made. If the INSURED refuses to consent to any whole or partial SETTLEMENT of a CLAIM recommended by the COMPANY within the applicable Limits of Liability, the COMPANY’S obligation to make any further payments for amounts in connection with the CLAIM incurred after the recommended SETTLEMENT was proposed shall not exceed the amount for which the CLAIM could have been settled by the COMPANY had the INSURED consented to the SETTLEMENT. The INSURED is not entitled to, and the COMPANY will not be obligated to pay, any DAMAGES or CLAIMS EXPENSE beyond that amount. To the extent the COMPANY pays any DAMAGES or CLAIMS EXPENSE beyond that amount, you agree that, after the CLAIM ends, such amounts shall be repaid to us by the INSUREDS , each according to his or her respective interest.

Does this first example scare you?  Well, we hope it does.  This clause means that that if you do not agree to the proposed settlement, you may be left hanging with a large out-of-pocket bill, including final damages beyond the original settlement amount and defense expense costs, including expensive attorney fees.

Consent to Settle – The Hammer Clause

This first example contains what is commonly called the Hammer Clause, which is defined as: *A provision (also known as the “hammer clause” and “blackmail settlement clause”) found in professional liability insurance policies that requires an insurer to seek an insured’s approval prior to settling a claim for a specific amount. However, if the insured does not approve the recommended figure, the consent to settlement clause states that the insurer will not be liable for any additional monies required to settle the claim or for the defense costs that accrue from the point after the insurer makes the settlement recommendation.

Okay, let us look at – Example 2:

Consent to Settle Example 2

We will obtain written consent from you before we settle a claim against you arising from a medical incident. You agree to waive such right to consent under the following circumstances:

  • The settlement amount is within any deductible amount applicable to the claim
  • You are deceased or adjudicated incompetent
  • Judgment is entered
  • Your license to practice medicine is suspended or revoked
  • The claim was reported under an Extended Reporting Period Endorsement to this policy
  • You, after reasonable efforts by us, cannot be located

Aside from the understandable exceptions, this clause provides full consent, meaning should you decide not to settle, the carrier would keep defending on your behalf at no additional cost to you. The only caveat is if the final judgment goes beyond your purchased policy limits.

Making the Decision That’s Right For You

Understanding the Consent to Settle clause will help you in deciding which coverage is right for you. Should you choose coverage with full consent, such as the second example, you will be able to enjoy peace of mind in knowing that your carrier is really fighting for you.  If you have any questions regarding your policy, we would be pleased to provide a no cost / no obligation consultation.

What are the concerns you have about your coverage?  We welcome your comments below.  If you find this post helpful, we simply ask that you share it.

*Reference provided by: International Risk Management Institute

The content is for informational purposes only. All matters must be analyzed on a case by case basis.

Malpractice Insurance Change Can Be Profitable!

Understanding Malpractice Insurance Clauses

Malpractice Insurance Strategy

We love talking to physicians about lowering their malpractice insurance premium and improving their coverage. In many instances, we find additional savings with better coverage through another carrier. The problem is that most clients assume they need to wait until their current policy expires to change carriers, which could be a year if they just renewed.

Physicians can move their malpractice insurance coverage mid-term, but looking into the current policy’s cancellation clause will help them in the following ways:

  • It will clarify their coverage needs.
  • It will show the real costs and savings.
  • It will enable them to make a better decision.

Let us show you how by looking at malpractice insurance cancellation clauses from two different carriers. For our illustrations, assume you currently have a policy that runs January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2014. The annual premium is $60,000. You decide to cancel on March 15, 2013.
 

Malpractice Insurance Cancellation Clauses

 

Here is the policy Cancellation Clause for Insurer 1
(Calculated Pro-Rata)

If the policy or a SCHEDULED NAMED INSURED is canceled by the FIRST NAMED INSURED : The FIRST NAMED INSURED will receive a refund of the pro-rata unearned premium amount.

Here is the calculation of your $48,000 refund:

Pro-Rata

 

 

 

 

Here is the policy Cancellation Clause for Insurer 2
(Calculated Short-Rate)

This policy may be canceled at any time by the policyholder by sending advance written notice to us stating when thereafter such cancellation shall be effective. We will return any unearned premium, less the customary short rate fee. However, the policy cancellation will still be effective even if you have not yet received any such return premium due you.

Here is calculation of your $43,200 refund:

Short-Rate

 

 

 
The industry customary short-rate penalty is 10%.  Note that you would have lost $4,800 if the second carrier provided your coverage.
 

Malpractice Insurance Strategy

There is one caveat here. We have found that when an insured pays the current policy in quarterly installments and then cancels coverage on the next quarterly installment due date, the carrier does not usually balance bill the client for the penalty amount.  In addition, similar giving up players in sports, if an insurance carrier wants to let go of an insured, they are most likely going to allow a pro-rata cancellation.

Knowing how your insurer calculates the return premium if you cancel coverage mid-tem will help you make a better decision in whether to move coverage.

In many cases, we have found that the premium savings we have provided with a new carrier outweigh the short-rate penalty amount.  For additional information on specific insurance coverages, check out our Education Page.
 

We are Here to Help!

What specific questions do you have about your coverage? We would love to hear from you.  Leave your comment below:

As always, we are always here to provide a complimentary coverage review.

Patient Safety #HCLDR 8/27/13 Chat Summary

Social Media Guide for Physicians

Establishing, Managing, and Protecting Your Online Reputation

Social Media Guide for Physicians

by Kevin Pho, MD

 

Why Use Social Media?

Through social media, we all have the ability to connect with our friends, family, and business associates – practically whomever we wish, in new ways that few even considered twenty years ago. Social media connects us in real time and allows us to share amazing volumes of information freely online.
 

Our Review

Establishing, Managing and Protecting Your Online Reputation by Kevin Pho, MD and Susan Gay is a book that establishes how physicians too are blessed with the ability to connect with their peers internationally, partake in online conferences and chats and, most importantly, communicate and interact with their patients in new ways. Once physicians embrace these technologies, social media can enhance their practices and open doors to new opportunities not otherwise realized.
 
Today, there are an increasing number of websites and platforms where physicians’ reputations are being built, whether they are aware of it or not. Although physicians spend an inordinate amount of time studying complicated medical text books and journals, this book is a fast, easy read. It presents itself as a 290 page, enjoyable guide filled with researched facts, true stories and online best practices proven to work.
 
Physicians can no longer view social media as simply a way to connect with family and friends. This book can set doctors and their staffs on the right course for managing online reputations and also growing their medical practice business!
 

What You Can Do

If you’re a physician (or any other type of professional), Google your own name and see what comes up. Do you show up at all? Is the content flattering and complimentary or can you spot embarrassing facts and false information? Today’s patients go to Google first to learn about their doctors’ reputations. And guess what? Social media content is found by the search engines, so beware!
 
Authors, Kevin Pho, MD and Susan Gay make a strong case that physicians must be proactive and no longer stand on the sidelines allowing patients and others to post inaccurate or damaging information about them. The authors worked diligently to seek out their peers and elicit their online experiences for us, which are sprinkled throughout the text. In addition, they have done an excellent job researching social media platforms and websites, using their analyses to provide readers with the best tools available. As the subtitle suggests, this is a guidebook where readers can follow the step-by-step instructions laid out to create or enhance their online presence. Physicians and others will learn best practices for each social media platform.
 
In summary, Dr. Pho and Susan Gay teach us why a good social media offense is a good social media defense.
 
As medical professional liability insurance advisors, Perron Insurance Services appreciates the discussion about the need for posting disclaimers, creating and adhering to a Social Media Policy, and honoring HIPAA compliance.
 

Download Free Healthcare Social Media Policy

As a bonus to this blog, our colleauges at Symplur, have provided us with a link to their Social Media Policy. We encourage and recommend you use this as a guide for your practice’s needs! Thank you, Symplur!
 
 Social Media Policy for Physicians and Staff

 

Statute of Limitations – Proposed Changes

Current Statute of Limitations Law in NY

Statute of Limitations - ImageAlthough this blog relates to the Statute of Limitations in New York, you may find some interesting points to refer back to in your own state’s law. The examples and potential “ramifications” listed below might also serve as advanced-warnings or early indicators of how similar legislation might impact the medical community in your state.

The Statute of Limitations sets a timeline for which medical malpractice claims must be filed. In New York, for example, the current Statute of Limitations (found in NY CPLR § 214-a : NY Code – Section 214-A) states the following:

“An action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice must be commenced within two years and six months of the act, omission or failure complained of or last treatment where there is continuous treatment for the same illness, injury or condition which gave rise to the said act, omission or failure; provided, however, that where the action is based upon the discovery of a foreign object in the body of the patient, the action may be commenced within one year of the date of such discovery or of the date of discovery of facts which would reasonably lead to such discovery, whichever is earlier. For the purpose of this section the term “continuous treatment” shall not include examinations undertaken at the request of the patient for the sole purpose of ascertaining the state of the patient’s condition. For the purpose of this section the term “foreign object” shall not include a chemical compound, fixation device or prosthetic aid or device.”
 

Proposed Amendment to Statute of Limitations

An amendment to New York CPLR 214-a was recently proposed, and fortunately for New York physicians, it never reached a vote and has been put on hold by its sponsors – at least for now.  The proposed amendment of CPLR 214-a would have been, of course, problematic for physicians, because it would “toll” (extend) the Statute of Limitations for a medical malpractice claim in a similar manner to toxic tort claims under CPLR 214-c (which deals with exposure to toxic substances and implantations such as breast implants). The proposal would have permitted filing of an action sounding in medical malpractice within 2 1/2 years of the end of a course of continuous treatment OR when the person knows, or reasonably should have known, of the negligent act or omission, whichever is LATER. Of course, this begs the question: What does reasonably should have known mean? The answer would require analysis by the Court in the context of a defendant’s Summary Judgment motion.
 

Examples

One example is the case of a failure to identify a tumor in a radiology report (e.g., x-ray, MRI, CT scan) which the patient does not learn about until the passage of say 2 1/2 years from the date of the study. In that case, the Statute of Limitations would not run until 5 years from the date of the radiology study in question.

Another example would be a physician’s failure to prescribe a standard of care medication for a particular condition on 1/1/13 and the patient subsequently learns on 7/1/15 (via being told by a different doctor or perhaps, reading about it in the NY Times or hearing about it on a TV talk show like “The Doctors”) that he will have to undergo an amputation due to a disease process or is terminally ill as a consequence of the failure to prescribe the medication. Again, the medical malpractice cause of action would not accrue until 7/1/15 (the date of discovery) and the Statute of Limitations would not expire until 1/1/18.
 

Ramifications of Changes

Clearly, if passed, the amendment to 214-a would have impacted the potential period of a physician’s exposure to suit and the coverage choices that ensue therefrom.  Because of the extended risk exposure, this ruling would have led to dramatic malpractice insurance increases for New York Physicians.  Although the amendment is tabled for now, we are concerned that it will resurface next year. We will continue to watch for any changes in this Statute of Limitations amendment and will keep you informed should they have any effect on your medical malpractice insurance premiums.

We are providing this information so that you are aware of some potential changes that can occur within your state’s Statute of Limitations.

We are grateful to Howard M. Merkrebs, Esq., partner in Rivkin Radler LLP’s Medical Malpractice Litigation Group, who provided information concerning the New York State statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims and the proposed amendment.

The content is for informational purposes only. All matters must be analyzed on a case by case basis.

Clinical Guidelines Help Decrease Risk

When we first read the article on Clinical Guidelines below, we were excited to share it with you. This information is invaluable  in reducing your risk, especially as you set up your practices to fit new government requirements.

Susan Martin, Esq., for Clinical Guidelines: Improving Quality to Decrease Risks

We are delighted to have Susan O. Martin, RN, JD,  Executive Vice President, Litigation Management / Loss Control of Best Practices Insurance Services, LLC, as our special guest blogger. In the following article, she discusses the importance of Clinical Guidelines and Performance Standards and how they are Improving Quality to Decrease Risks.

 

Improving Outcomes

There is no doubt that the ultimate goal of all health care practitioners is to improve patient outcomes.  Attorneys want better outcomes as well, because happy, satisfied patients correlate to fewer lawsuits filed against health care providers. While performance standards, professional clinical guidelines or protocols of care are often employed in an attempt to improve outcomes, as an attorney, it is problematic to review or give advice regarding them because plaintiff attorneys will try to use these documents as “standards of care,” even if that is clearly not the intent. For example, if a protocol states that a patient is to have antibiotics on board within a specific time of the diagnosis of pneumonia, and the antibiotic is given twenty minutes after the time period required, is that considered a violation of the standard of care?

 

The Rise of Clinical Guidelines & Performance Standards

Emergency physicians and emergency medicine groups execute agreements with their hospital partners which place clinical guidelines and performance standards and core measures directly on the physicians in the practice. Most medical specialty organizations and institutions require some form of clinical performance measurement as well.

For example, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association have recommended core measures for treating patients with ST segment MI and non ST segment MI. Those cases used to represent the majority of cases filed against emergency room physicians, but in the past five years, the “missed MI” cases out of the emergency department are very few. Now, with the institution of the “code STEMI” in the pre-hospital care environment, and the hospital cath labs responding immediately, patients are having better outcomes and heart muscle salvage.

Many of these core measurements are used by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for post review of the quality of care delivered to Medicare patients. While many practitioners would argue that CMS is merely looking for an avenue to deny payment to those facilities and physicians who do not follow the criteria, CMS would argue it is only seeking better outcomes for its beneficiaries, including decreased hospital admissions. Unfortunately, many times these performance criteria are promulgated by committees or hospitals as “standards of care,” which further expose medical staff members.

 

Clinical Guidelines & Performance Standards vs. Standards of Care

The term “standard of care” is a legal term used in courts of law to determine a practitioner’s duty to a patient. Standards of care are determined by jury, judge and/or expert testimony. In contrast, clinical guidelines – performance standards are recommendations by hospitals, medical staff committees and professional review organizations to provide a “road map” for practitioners to consider. As recommendations that change over time, these guidelines should not set policy. They should never be considered as hard evidence in a medical malpractice lawsuit. It is recommended that any clinical guidelines or protocols set up for mid-level practitioners, physicians, or other health care providers have language that allows the practitioner the flexibility to use his or her own independent medical judgment.

 

Tips for Writing Clinical Guidelines & Performance Standards

In writing such guidelines, we suggest the following:

• Clinical guidelines – performance standards should have the following language at the beginning of the page:

“These guidelines are tools and considerations for the practitioner’s use and are not intended to suggest or dictate medical standards of care. Each patient has individualized needs and each practitioner must use his or her own professional independent judgment in medical decision making for each patient’s treatment plan of care. “

 
With this language at the beginning of each clinical recommendation, you can respond accordingly. If asked in deposition testimony, you can state that you know of the guidelines, but you determined that your patient, Jane Doe, needed different treatment modalities, and you were acting in the best interest of the patient at the time of care.

• Use caution in using words such as “practitioners shall always”or “practitioner shall ensure that.”
Again, the wording must give flexibility for the practitioner and should not denote absolute terms.

• Nursing policies can be somewhat more problematic, yet required by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health care Organizations (JCAHO) and nursing boards. Nurses are accustomed to policies and procedures, which they strictly construe. For example, instead of a policy that states, “Vital signs shall be repeated every two (2) hours,” a departure from which would be considered a violation of hospital policy, if possible, allow patient acuity to better define the guidelines. It would be better to state, “Vital signs shall be repeated according to the acuity of the patient or as ordered by the physician.” In this manner, nurses are not charged with taking repeat vital signs on non-acute patients or patients who do not require it.

 

Get Involved – Develop Clinical Guidelines & Performance Standards

Whatever term is used core measurements, performance standards or clinical guidelines – these policies are here to stay.  It is in the practitioner’s best interest to assist in the development of these measurements in their hospitals and/or their specialty organizations to draft reasonable and medically sound criteria that gives flexibility and allows practitioners to continue to determine individual patient needs.

 

About Susan O. Martin, RN, JD

Susan has a unique background that compliments the integrity of AMS Best Practices. Prior to joining Best Practices, she was Chief Legal Counsel for a physician management group consisting of primary care, multi-specialists and ED physicians. Prior to her role as Chief Legal Counsel, Susan managed the litigation and risk management for a large, national physician practice management company (EmCare). She has also been in private practice defending physicians in lawsuits, as well as handling regulatory matters and insurance coverage issues.

 

About Best Practices Insurance Services, LLC

Best Practices Insurance Services, LLC (BPIS) is the exclusive agent for Applied Medico-legal Solutions Risk Retention Group (AMS RRG) providing underwriting, brokering, clinical risk management, claims management oversight and distribution services.

For questions regarding Clinical Guidelines & Performance Standards: Improving Quality to Decrease Risks, please contact Steve Shapiro, MD, Chief Medical Officer, at (800) 367-1 337 or Susan Martin, Esq. at (866) 520-6896.

 

If you’ve liked what you have read here, please share the information with your colleagues. Our agency’s goal is to provide you with information that will enable you to reduce risk and malpractice claims, so that you can enjoy a successful practice.  We welcome any thoughts or suggestions on how we can help you achieve these goals.

If you have questions about reducing insurance premiums, risk reduction and improving overall coverage, feel free to contact me, Michelle Perron, personally at (603) 926-1318.

 

Malpractice Insurance Costs Over Time

malpractice insurance costs comparison

Physicians often choose malpractice insurance coverage based on attractive up front pricing without understanding the implications of their malpractice insurance costs over time.  In this post, we illustrate and compare current and future costs over time between two competitive markets for the same physician.

 

Let’s look at malpractice insurance costs from Carrier 1:

Carrier 1 Example

Here we are providing malpractice insurance costs from two types of  coverage, Occurrence vs. Claims Made Coverage, for the current (Year 1) and seven consecutive years afterward with rates and physician claim experience remaining constant. Note that with Occurrence coverage, the premium remains consistent. With Claims Made, the premium increases due to the Claims Made Step Factor. Remember, since the Claims Made trigger date is the date claims are filed, there is a lower chance of a claim being filed for the first few years. This is the reason for the step-up factors. Risk exposure increases as time passes. Claims Made Step Factors differ between carriers, so it is important to carefully review each of them. As you can see, we have included Cumulative Costs in this coverage example, including the purchase of a Tail in the Claims Made example should one be needed. Note that the increase of purchasing Occurrence vs. Claims Made is minimal in this example.

 

Now, let’s look at malpractice insurance costs from Carrier 2:

Carrier 2 ExampleNotice that with this carrier, the Occurrence rate and Claims Made Mature rate are equal and the Claims Made Step Factors and Tail Factors differ. More importantly, look at the Cumulative Cost Difference. See how the Claims Made Coverage will cost approximately $24,000 more than if you had purchased Occurrence in Year 8, should you need to purchase a tail?

 

Extended Reporting Period Waivers

When comparing these coverages, it is also important to review the Extended Reporting Period (Tail) Waiver, which provides a Free Tail. For the carriers listed above, these waivers are as follows:

Carrier 1

The carrier will provide a waiver for the Extended Reporting Period upon the following:

1. Death

2. Disability

3. Retirement at the age of at least 60 and having been insured with the carrier for at least five consecutive years or retirement at any age and having been insured with the carrier for at least seven consecutive years.

Carrier 2

The carrier will provide a waiver for the Extended Reporting Period upon the following:

1. Death

2. Permanent and Total Disability

3. Permanent and total retirement from the practice of medicine after he/she attains the age of 65 or older and has been insured on a claims made basis by an authorized insurer for five or more consecutive years

4. Permanent and total retirement after an insured attains the age of 55 or older and has been insured on a claims made basis by an authorized insurer for ten or more consecutive years

5. Permanent or total retirement and has maintained claims made coverage with an authorized insurer for at least 10 consecutive years, provided the last five consecutive years were with the carrier.

 

Summary

We believe that physicians need a full understanding of their malpractice insurance costs before making their purchasing decision. There is healthy competition between carriers which makes some stronger in certain areas than others. Understanding long-term costs and contingencies goes a long way in mitigating or preventing heavy financial impacts when carriers provide unexpected premium quotes in future years.

A comprehensive assessment of malpractice insurance costs and coverage types can improve the financial health of your practice and should be part of your business strategy. Most of today’s focus in healthcare tends to be on the Income side of the balance sheet, when in reality, both Income and Expenses are equally important.

We continually research the market to find the best resources to help you. The Fox Group is an experienced management consulting firm that specializes in assisting physicians and other healthcare providers throughout the U.S. and abroad to achieve their strategic and operational goals. While they are clearly in the business of consulting to healthcare providers, they do provide some free valuable resources. As part of your malpractice insurance costs assessment, you may be interested in considering their Medical Practice Assessment, which may reveal insights into the real financial health of your practice. This is just one of many valuable sites we’ll link to our blog to continually keep you informed. Please visit here often for business tips and important updates in risk management.